FAQ: Forced Buyout?

How Does a Forced Buyout Work in a California LLC?

You didn’t plan to sell. But now your co-owner is pushing you out — offering a number that feels wrong, on a timeline that feels rushed, with paperwork you’re not sure you should sign. Whether this is called a buyout, a redemption, or a member withdrawal, the pressure is real. And so are your rights.

Here’s what California law says about forced buyouts in LLCs — and what you can do if you’re on the receiving end of one.

What Is a Forced Buyout?

A forced buyout occurs when a majority member — or a group of members — uses control of the LLC to compel a minority member to sell their interest, often at a price the minority member didn’t negotiate and doesn’t agree with. It can happen through:

  • A provision in the operating agreement that allows majority members to buy out a minority member under certain conditions
  • A claim that the minority member has breached the operating agreement, triggering a buyout right
  • Economic pressure — cutting distributions, eliminating a management role, or making the minority member’s position untenable
  • A judicial dissolution proceeding used as leverage to force a sale

Sometimes the operating agreement explicitly governs the process. Often it doesn’t — and that’s where California law fills the gap.

What Your Operating Agreement Controls

The starting point is always the operating agreement. California’s LLC law gives members significant flexibility to define their own rules for buyouts, withdrawals, and transfers of membership interest. (Cal. Corporations Code § 17701.10.) Courts will generally enforce a well-drafted operating agreement as written. (Cornerstone Realty Advisors, LLC v. Summit Healthcare REIT, Inc. (2020) 56 Cal.App.5th 771.)

But operating agreements are often silent, ambiguous, or one-sided. If the agreement was drafted by your partner’s attorney — or if it was a template nobody really reviewed — there may be provisions that appear to authorize a forced buyout but that don’t hold up under scrutiny.

Key questions to ask about your operating agreement:

  • Does it define how a buyout price is calculated — and by whom?
  • Does it require an independent valuation or allow the majority to set the price unilaterally?
  • Does it give you any right to trigger a buyout of your own, or to force a sale of the entire company?
  • Does it contain a “put” or “call” option, a right of first refusal, or a shotgun clause?

If your agreement is silent on valuation, California law steps in.

How California Law Determines Fair Value

When a buyout is court-ordered — or when the parties can’t agree on price — California courts use “fair value” as the standard, not “fair market value.” This is an important distinction. Fair market value typically applies a minority discount, reducing your interest’s value because you hold a non-controlling stake. Fair value generally does not apply such a discount. (Legality of Minority Discounts: Cal. Corporations Code § 17707.03; see also Ryland Mews Homeowners Assn. v. Munoz (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 705 for valuation principles in dissolution contexts.)

In practice, fair value is determined by:

  • The LLC’s total enterprise value — often established through a business appraisal
  • Your proportionate ownership percentage applied to that value
  • Adjustments for any loans, capital contributions, or distributions owed to you

Courts have discretion in ordering buyouts and setting terms. Under Corporations Code § 17707.03(c), when a court finds grounds for dissolution, it may order a buyout of the petitioning member’s interest as an alternative to dissolving the LLC entirely — at a price and on terms the court determines to be equitable.

Your Rights If You Disagree With the Offered Price

You are not required to accept the number your partner puts on the table. If you believe the offered price is below fair value, you have several options:

  • Demand an independent appraisal. Even if your operating agreement doesn’t require one, you can negotiate for one — and the threat of litigation often makes the majority more willing to agree.
  • Petition for judicial dissolution. Filing — or credibly threatening to file — a dissolution petition under Corporations Code § 17707.03 changes the leverage dynamic significantly. A majority member who wants to keep the business running has strong incentive to negotiate seriously rather than face a court-supervised wind-down.
  • Assert breach of fiduciary duty. Managing members owe fiduciary duties to minority members under California law. (Corp. Code § 17704.09.) If the forced buyout is being used to enrich the majority at your expense, that may constitute a breach — and give rise to damages beyond just the buyout price.
  • Challenge the process itself. If the majority failed to follow the operating agreement’s procedures, or acted in bad faith in triggering the buyout, the entire transaction may be voidable.

The Implied Covenant of Good Faith

Even when an operating agreement gives the majority broad buyout rights, California courts impose a duty of good faith and fair dealing on all parties. (Carma Developers (Cal.), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 342.) This means the majority cannot exercise its contractual rights in a way designed primarily to harm you or deprive you of the benefits of your membership interest. If the forced buyout is pretextual — driven by a desire to freeze you out rather than a legitimate business reason — that matters legally.

What to Do Right Now

If you’ve received a buyout offer or been told your interest is being purchased, treat it as the beginning of a negotiation, not the end of one. Before you respond:

  • Do not sign any agreement, release, or acknowledgment
  • Gather and preserve all financial records, operating agreements, and communications
  • Get an independent assessment of the company’s value
  • Speak with an attorney who handles LLC member disputes

The price your partner offered is almost never the right price. And the timeline they’re imposing is almost never as fixed as they want you to believe.

Key Legal References

  • Cal. Corporations Code § 17701.10 — Operating agreement governs LLC relations among members
  • Cal. Corporations Code § 17704.09 — Fiduciary duties of managing members
  • Cal. Corporations Code § 17707.03 — Judicial dissolution of LLC; court may order buyout as alternative remedy
  • Cal. Corporations Code § 17707.03(c) — Court authority to order buyout at equitable price in lieu of dissolution
  • Code of Civil Procedure § 337 — Four-year statute of limitations on written contract claims
  • Code of Civil Procedure § 338(d) — Three-year statute of limitations on fraud and fiduciary duty claims
  • Cornerstone Realty Advisors, LLC v. Summit Healthcare REIT, Inc. (2020) 56 Cal.App.5th 771 — Enforcement of operating agreement provisions
  • Ryland Mews Homeowners Assn. v. Munoz (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 705 — Valuation principles in dissolution contexts
  • Carma Developers (Cal.), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 342 — Implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing

Gregory Rutchik is a California shareholder dispute and business divorce attorney representing founders, LLC members, and creative professionals when business partnerships break down. If you’ve received a buyout offer you didn’t ask for, contact Gregory at (310) 448-6743 or gregory@rutchik.com.

Accessibility Tools
hide