What Can I Do If My Business Partner Is Freezing Me Out in California?
You built something together. Now your business partner isn't returning your calls, has cut off your access to company accounts, and is making major decisions without you. You're still an owner — but you're being treated like you're not. This is called a freeze-out, and it happens more often than you'd think.
Here's what you need to know.
What Is a Freeze-Out?
A freeze-out occurs when a majority owner — or a partner who controls day-to-day operations — uses that control to squeeze out a minority owner. Common tactics include:
- Locking you out of bank accounts, email systems, or company premises
- Excluding you from meetings and key decisions
- Cutting or eliminating your salary or distributions
- Diluting your ownership stake without your consent
- Threatening a forced sale of your interest at an artificially low price
In California, these tactics aren't just unfair — they may be illegal.
Your Legal Rights as a Minority Owner in California
California law imposes fiduciary duties on majority shareholders and managing members. Directors and majority shareholders owe a duty of loyalty to minority shareholders — meaning they must act in the company's and all owners' interests, not just their own. (Sheehan v. Oblates of St. Francis de Sales (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 438.) When managing members of an LLC abuse their control, they can be held personally liable for the harm caused. (Feresi v. The Livery, LLC (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 419.)
Depending on how your business is structured — corporation, LLC, or partnership — California law may entitle you to:
- An accounting — a full review of the company's books and finances, which courts may order under Corporations Code § 1601 (corporations) or § 17704.10 (LLCs)
- Access to company records — California Corporations Code § 1600 gives shareholders the right to inspect accounting books and records upon written demand; LLC members have similar rights under Corporations Code § 17704.10
- A court-ordered buyout — at fair value, not the lowball number your partner is offering (Brown v. Allied Corrugated Box Co. (1979) 91 Cal.App.3d 477)
- Dissolution of the company — under Corporations Code § 1800, a minority shareholder holding at least one-third of outstanding shares may petition for involuntary dissolution when those in control act oppressively, fraudulently, or in a manner that is unfairly prejudicial
- Damages — if your partner's conduct caused you financial harm, you may have claims for breach of fiduciary duty and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing
For LLCs specifically, Corporations Code § 17707.03 provides grounds for judicial dissolution when it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business in conformity with the operating agreement — a powerful remedy when a managing member has gone rogue.
Courts have made clear that majority owners cannot use their control as a weapon. In Bauer v. Bauer (1996) 46 Cal.App.4th 1106, the court recognized that freeze-out tactics designed to force a minority owner to sell at a depressed price constitute actionable oppression under California law.
Statute of Limitations — Don't Wait
Your window to act is not unlimited. Breach of fiduciary duty claims generally carry a three-year statute of limitations under Code of Civil Procedure § 338(d). Claims based on written agreements may be subject to a four-year limit under CCP § 337. And while a petition for dissolution under Corporations Code § 1800 has no fixed limitations period, delay can undermine your equitable remedies and negotiating leverage.
Do not wait. Freeze-outs are often designed to pressure you into accepting a bad deal — or to run out the clock on your legal options. The longer you wait, the more leverage you lose.
Before you respond to your partner, before you sign anything, and before you accept any buyout offer, speak with an attorney who handles shareholder disputes and business divorce. The early moves matter enormously.
You should also start preserving evidence now: save emails, texts, financial statements, and any communications that show you've been excluded. Courts pay attention to this record.
What Happens Next
Most freeze-out situations resolve without going to court. An experienced attorney can often use the threat of litigation — and the strength of California's minority shareholder protections — to negotiate a fair buyout or restructured arrangement. The goal isn't always to burn the company down. It's to get you what you're owed.
But getting there requires moving strategically, not emotionally.
Key Legal References
- Cal. Corporations Code § 1600 — Shareholder right to inspect books and records
- Cal. Corporations Code § 1601 — Court-ordered accounting for corporations
- Cal. Corporations Code § 1800 — Grounds for involuntary dissolution of a corporation
- Cal. Corporations Code § 17704.10 — LLC member rights to information and inspection
- Cal. Corporations Code § 17707.03 — Judicial dissolution of an LLC
- Code of Civil Procedure § 337 — Four-year statute of limitations (written contracts)
- Code of Civil Procedure § 338(d) — Three-year statute of limitations (fraud/fiduciary duty)
- Sheehan v. Oblates of St. Francis de Sales (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 438 — Fiduciary duties of majority shareholders
- Feresi v. The Livery, LLC (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 419 — Personal liability of managing members
- Brown v. Allied Corrugated Box Co. (1979) 91 Cal.App.3d 477 — Fair value in minority buyouts
- Bauer v. Bauer (1996) 46 Cal.App.4th 1106 — Freeze-out tactics as shareholder oppression
Gregory Rutchik is a California shareholder dispute and business divorce attorney representing founders, LLC members, and creative professionals when business partnerships break down. If your partner is freezing you out, contact Gregory at (310) 448-6743 or gregory@rutchik.com.

